|
Here Peter Staudenmaier claims that he is
really striving for an honest understanding of Steiner and
Anthroposophy, "and so forth." When pressed, he
will always say this, but then he refuses to actually read
anything beyond the paragraphs he quotes.
To: <anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com>
References: <20040306002331.66763.qmail@web14425.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] agreement and disagreement
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 09:50:51 -0500
Daniel Hindes:
"Whether or not you wish to claim that you are striving
for an honest understanding of Steiner and Anthroposophy (so
far you have been very careful not to actually claim this
for yourself)."
Peter Staudenmaier:
I have? Yes, I wish to claim that I am striving for an honest
understanding of Steiner and Anthroposophy. I'm also striving
for an accurate and meaningful understanding of Steiner and
anthroposophy. I'm also striving for a critical understanding
of Steiner and anthroposophy. And so forth.
Daniel:
Good. I just wanted to be clear about this, because I have
carefully gone over your previous statements on this matter
and found that none of them before this one could be quoted
to establish this fact.
Daniel Hindes
Peter Staudenmaier did not respond to this message.
|