It looks like I might have to start photographing some old buildings...

|
Q: It looks like Imight have to start photographing some old buildings, and since I'll be traveling/walking a lot, I'd like to carry a single lens. I don't want the buildings to look any more crooked than they actually are! Any suggestions?

I don't know if this is possible, but... Try to get a ways back from the building, then photograph it with the 35mm f/2.0 (the 1.4 would work as well, but it is 3 times the price and the same sharpness). The 35mm f/2.0 is a VERY good lens. If you can get access to the building across from it, you could take the picture from one of the upper stories, and that would be best of all. Otherwise, depending on your needs (i.e. how close to the building you are forced to stand) any of the other Minolta primes would do well as well (28mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2.8 20mm f/2.8). Obviously, the closer you are to the building, and the wider the lens, the more pronounced the "keystone" effect will be. This is why I recommended the narrowest lens lens practical, combined with the greatest distance possible. With a really wide lens you can take the picture with the film plane perpendicular to the horizontal, then cut off the bottom half of the picture. This will minimize distortion, but the keystone effect remains. With a darkroom, you can equalize it a bit by tilting print paper so the light falls on it at an angle, essentially reversing the keystone, but this takes some experimentation to get right. Similar things can be done in Photoshop, but expect to spend hours.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Daniel Hindes published on June 19, 2001 8:13 AM.

I have some extra money in my pocket. I don't know if I should upgrade to the Maxxum 9 or buy a Maxxum 200mm f/2.8 lens. Advice? was the previous entry in this blog.

What is the SRT battery problem? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.