The epistemological problem of pure of discourse analysis

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Epistemologically, if you spend all of your time analyzing a discourse without reference to the original subject of the discourse, you run the risk of remaining so highly abstracted from the subject of study that you get not closer to the truth, not closer to reality, but further away from it. This of course presupposes that you believe in such a thing as "reality". An alternative point of view denies that there is such a thing as "reality", or at least denies it is possible to know such a thing. In that world, all there is are discourses, and any one discourse is just a serviceable as any other discourse. But reality has a curious way of continually reasserting itself.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Daniel Hindes published on February 26, 2008 6:57 PM.

More thoughts on Said's Orientalism was the previous entry in this blog.

Are there Evil Virtures? Slavery, virtue, and practice in MacIntyre's moral philosophy is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.