To: <anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com>
References: <20040222185816.96181.qmail@web14422.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] agreement and disagreement
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:24:06 -0500
Peter Staudenmaier (back in February):
Sure. Daniel said a few days back: "To anyone who has
done a comparative study of the two, similarities between
Rosenberg and Steiner are tenuous at best. Claiming that Rudolf
Steiner's teachings became official mythology of Nazi Germany
is patently absurd." I think the second sentence is more
or less accurate, if a bit overheated, but I disagree with
the first sentence.
Daniel:
Peter, could you perhaps elaborate on how you see Rosenberg
being similar to Steiner? I would find it helpful to hear
some examples of specific instances where they agree. I am
curious to determine whether this is another example of confusing
similar terms for similar concepts, or if the case is perhaps
made from such generic points of agreement that have nothing
at all to do with race.
Thanks.
Daniel
|