Daniel Hindes: writings
Blog Essays Book Reviews Music Reviews How-to's Miscellaneous
All these exchanges are taken from the public Anthroposphy Tomorrow list archives. Return to the Peter Staudenmaier page.
To: <anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com>
References: <20040222185816.96181.qmail@web14422.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] agreement and disagreement
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:24:06 -0500

Peter Staudenmaier (back in February):
Sure. Daniel said a few days back: "To anyone who has done a comparative study of the two, similarities between Rosenberg and Steiner are tenuous at best. Claiming that Rudolf Steiner's teachings became official mythology of Nazi Germany is patently absurd." I think the second sentence is more or less accurate, if a bit overheated, but I disagree with the first sentence.

Daniel:
Peter, could you perhaps elaborate on how you see Rosenberg being similar to Steiner? I would find it helpful to hear some examples of specific instances where they agree. I am curious to determine whether this is another example of confusing similar terms for similar concepts, or if the case is perhaps made from such generic points of agreement that have nothing at all to do with race.

Thanks.

Daniel

Copyright 1989-2007 Daniel Hindes