Daniel Hindes: writings
Blog Essays Book Reviews Music Reviews How-to's Miscellaneous

All these exchanges are taken from the public Anthroposphy Tomorrow list archives. Return to the Peter Staudenmaier page.
To: <anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com>
References: <20040312192053.19740.qmail@web14422.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] agreement and disagreement
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:40:14 -0500

Peter Staudenmaier:
I asked Daniel: "Do you think that no Jewish people means no Jews, or don't you?"
And Daniel replied: "No."
Okay, so you don't agree that no Jewish people means no Jews. Could you (or Frank) explain how there can be Jews if Jewry as such has disappeared and the Jewish people has dissolved and ceased to exist?


Daniel:
I did? I really said that? (Just like Steiner talked about "root races" in GA 121, I suppose).
Peter, you seem to have an extraordinarily difficult time with subtlties. For the third (and hopefully final) time, here is my thought. Try reading it.

Daniel wrote:
And I repeat: "I find nothing in Steiner's statement to preclude Jews from maintaining some form or their religious practices and assimilating precicely as they desired (and as you claim Steiner was against)." Perhaps there are different ways of understanding what the phrase "as a people" might mean. You seem to imagine that Steiner meant that Jews would no longer be Jews. I tend to think that Steiner wanted Jews not to be recognizable as Jews by any external or cultural cues, so that you could not tell whether a person was or was not a Jew merely by talking to them in a cafe. I don't think he was intent on abolishing all religious practices, religion being an area that he felt to be the responsibility of the free individual. This type of assimilation appears to me to be the goal of a large number of liberal Jews during that time period, and something that has been achieved to a large degree in the US today.

In approaching this paragraph, the subtlties of the German word "Volk" should be observed. I read the statemet of Steiner's to indicate that he wanted the "Folk" element of Jewishness to cease being a point of self-identification. As I have pointed out, Steiner wanted the "Folk" element of German-ness to disappear as well; he wanted the "Folk" element of every nationality and ethnic group to disappear. Steiner most emphatically did not want the individual Jews to cease to exist. This can be confusing by rendering the German word "Folk" as "people" as I'm sure you realize with your excellent command of German.

Copyright 1989-2007 Daniel Hindes