Daniel writes:
"Steiner most often spoke in general on this theme, without any examples."

Peter Staudenmaier:
Yup. You and I were talking about those cases in which he *did* use examples, remember?

Daniel:
Peter, are you trying to talk with me or are you just wasting my time? Please tell me what my point was, one, two and three posts ago, so I know that you are actually listening. Otherwise I will cease wasting my time repeating myself. If you are capable of this, I will continue the conversation.

----------------------------------------------

"Peter Staudenmaier:
Indeed. No Jewish people means no Jews.

Daniel:
Peter, are you talking with me or just posturing? What do you think I wrote in my original? Did you read it for content, or just hit "reply" and ignore the entire statement?"

Peter Staudenmaier:
Are you agreeing or disagreeing with what I wrote above? Do you think that no Jewish people means no Jews, or don't you?

Daniel:
No. I am asking you if you read my posts two and three exchanges ago. Did you? What was my point back then? Did you read it before responding? Did you? I will not repeat myself more than three times. Try picking up where you left off.

Daniel Hindes